Gini Loh System Tools

AI Automation Index

Will AI Replace Training and Development Specialists?

Task-level automation exposure for Training and Development Specialists: 20 O*NET tasks scored against their work activities, plus the simulator.

E-E-A-T Verified
Developed & audited by Gini Loh

Automation Exposure

53% weighted task index

20 of 20 tasks scored

Median Salary

$69,280 / year

BLS OEWS, May 2025 — this exact occupation

Employment Level

Very High

458,300 people hold this job — size, not growth

Projected 2025–35

+10.8% employment change

46,000 openings a year · BLS line item

Pay by state

BLS OEWS publishes 54 state estimates for this occupation. Each is its own survey estimate, not the national median adjusted for local prices.

$42,950 – $88,570

Highest medians

Delaware $88,570
New Hampshire $86,050
Alaska $81,860
Washington $81,860
District of Columbia $80,980

Lowest medians

Guam $42,950
Puerto Rico $47,820
Virgin Islands $50,430
Arkansas $52,290
Mississippi $53,680

State figures come from the 13-1151 row in the May 2025 state panel. States where the estimate was suppressed or too small to publish are absent.

What the score is made of

Each task is mapped to its work activities, scored for AI automation potential, and weighted by how important those activities are to the job. These are the components.

Automation potential 53%

Importance-weighted mean of the scored tasks. This is the headline index.

Physical work 0%

Share of weighted tasks in hands-on or machine-operating work activities.

Judgment & influence 79%

Share in analysis, decisions, teaching, directing, advising, or caring for others.

Routine administration 22%

Share in documenting, recording, and administrative activities.

Rewritten by O*NET 0%

Share of weighted tasks O*NET rewrote in a recent update. Reported, not folded into the score.

Consequence of error 4/100 Low

O*NET's own rating of how serious an uncorrectable mistake would be here — respondents, not us. Deliberately not in the index: the score measures what AI can do with the task content, and multiplying it by stakes would be our judgment dressed as data.

Constituent Task Mix

20 tasks for this occupation, weighted by work-activity importance. Shares below are of total task weight, not task count.

High exposure (≥ 60% of the task is automatable) 21%

4 tasks

Medium exposure (≥ 35%) 79%

16 tasks

Low exposure (below 35%) 0%

0 tasks

How would you survive?

Move your week away from the high-exposure tasks and toward the ones that need judgment. The simulator recalculates the index as you shift the mix.

Simulate Upskilling →

Constituent Tasks

#94 · Core · 50% automatable

Present information with a variety of instructional techniques or formats, such as role playing, simulations, team exercises, group discussions, videos, or lectures.

interpersonal — Job-skill training content AI-assisted; coaching human

Train personnel to enhance job skills.
#20475 · Core · 59% automatable

Obtain, organize, or develop training procedure manuals, guides, or course materials, such as handouts or visual materials.

text generation — Draft training materials; human tailors content

Develop training materials. Coordinate training activities.
#19559 · Core · 42% automatable

Evaluate modes of training delivery, such as in-person or virtual, to optimize training effectiveness, training costs, or environmental impacts.

interpersonal — Organizational surveys need human access and trust

Conduct surveys in organizations.
#97 · Core · 50% automatable

Offer specific training programs to help workers maintain or improve job skills.

interpersonal — Job-skill training content AI-assisted; coaching human

Train personnel to enhance job skills.
#103 · Core · 42% automatable

Assess training needs through surveys, interviews with employees, focus groups, or consultation with managers, instructors, or customer representatives.

interpersonal — Organizational surveys need human access and trust

Conduct surveys in organizations.
#98 · Core · 65% automatable

Monitor, evaluate, or record training activities or program effectiveness.

decision support — Policy evaluation needs organizational context and judgment

Evaluate effectiveness of personnel policies or practices. Evaluate training programs, instructors, or materials.
#20474 · Core · 59% automatable

Design, plan, organize, or direct orientation and training programs for employees or customers.

text generation — Draft training materials; human tailors content

Develop training materials. Coordinate training activities.
#102 · Core · 38% automatable

Develop alternative training methods if expected improvements are not seen.

interpersonal — Coordinating training is partly automatable but relational

Coordinate training activities.
#101 · Core · 52% automatable

Evaluate training materials prepared by instructors, such as outlines, text, or handouts.

decision support — Training evaluation needs observation and human judgment

Evaluate training programs, instructors, or materials. Coordinate training activities.
#20476 · Core · 78% automatable

Monitor training costs and prepare budget reports to justify expenditures.

data analysis — Financial indicator monitoring is well-suited to AI analytics

Monitor financial indicators. Prepare financial documents, reports, or budgets.
#106 · Core · 48% automatable

Devise programs to develop executive potential among employees in lower-level positions.

interpersonal — Managerial training content draftable, facilitation is human

Train personnel on managerial topics.
#93 · Core · 78% automatable

Keep up with developments in area of expertise by reading current journals, books, or magazine articles.

information retrieval — AI surfaces updates; human internalizes knowledge

Update professional knowledge.
#99 · Core · 78% automatable

Attend meetings or seminars to obtain information for use in training programs or to inform management of training program status.

information retrieval — AI surfaces updates; human internalizes knowledge

Update professional knowledge.
#100 · Core · 40% automatable

Coordinate recruitment and placement of training program participants.

interpersonal — Recruitment coordination aided by AI, human decides

Coordinate personnel recruitment activities.
#105 · Core · 59% automatable

Select and assign instructors to conduct training.

text generation — Draft training materials; human tailors content

Develop training materials. Coordinate training activities.
#108 · Core · 35% automatable

Negotiate contracts with clients for desired training outcomes, fees, or expenses.

interpersonal — Contract negotiation needs mandate and accountability

Negotiate contracts with clients or service providers.
#20477 · Core · 48% automatable

Supervise, evaluate, or refer instructors to skill development classes.

decision support — Training evaluation needs observation and human judgment

Evaluate training programs, instructors, or materials. Supervise employees.
#95 · Core · 38% automatable

Schedule classes based on availability of classrooms, equipment, or instructors.

interpersonal — Coordinating training is partly automatable but relational

Coordinate training activities.
#111 · Supplemental · 55% automatable

Refer trainees to employer relations representatives, to locations offering job placement assistance, or to appropriate social services agencies, if warranted.

interpersonal — HR advice sensitive; accountability and context human

Advise others on human resources topics.
#19558 · Supplemental · 55% automatable

Develop or implement training programs related to efficiency, recycling, or other issues with environmental impacts.

text generation — Procedural training content AI-assisted; delivery human

Train personnel in organizational or compliance procedures.
Embed this calculator on your site ↓

Bloggers & authors: Embed this interactive calculator directly in your articles or comparison guides. It loads dynamically via a responsive iframe (auto-resizing to prevent double scrollbars) and provides a direct, high-value tool for your audience.

<div class="giniloh-calculator-embed" data-calculator="training-and-development-specialists"></div> <script src="https://giniloh.com/embed.js" async></script>

Community Sentiment

Do you agree?

Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?

Method

How this was scored

  1. 1. Tasks. O*NET task statements for this occupation, from a release whose newest record is dated 08/2026.
  2. 2. Work activities. Each task maps to 1–5 Detailed Work Activities; each activity belongs to one of 41 Generalized Work Activities that O*NET rates for importance (1–5) in this occupation.
  3. 3. Automation potential. Every work activity carries one score for how far current AI can perform it end-to-end. Tasks inherit the mean of their activities.
  4. 4. Weighting. Task weight = 0.35 + 0.65 × (importance − 1)/4, scaled by how often the task is performed and by 0.7 for Supplemental tasks. Importance is the task's own O*NET rating where it exists (18,369 of 18,838 tasks); the rest inherit their work activities' importance. The index is the weighted mean.

Check: across the 910 occupations where O*NET also rates how far machine speed sets the pace, this index moves opposite to it (Spearman ρ = -0.49). The more a job is paced by equipment, the less of its task content AI can address — the relationship you would expect if the scoring is working.

Sources · O*NET 31.0 (task records to 08/2026) · BLS OEWS May 2025 · BLS projections 2025-2035 · rubric v2.1 · tasks for O*NET, not a forecast

See the full method →

Related Article

Engineer at work

Best AI Proof Jobs in a Changing Market

Worried robots are coming for your paycheck? You’re not alone—but the real story is far more hopeful. This guide cuts through the scare headlines to reveal exactly where smart, sustainable career opportunities exist right now. We’ve curated a list of true ai proof jobs—roles in healthcare, skilled trades, and cybersecurity that not only survive automation but thrive because of human judgment and empathy. You’ll get specific, money-making data on projected growth (the BLS says wind turbine technicians, for instance, will grow 44% by 2032), real salary ranges from active job listings, and a simple self-assessment quiz to identify your own most resilient path. Plus, we name companies hiring today and the niche job boards they use. Stop worrying and start planning—your secure career is closer than you think.

Read Article ->