Gini Loh System Tools

AI Automation Index

Will AI Replace Computer and Information Research Scientists?

Task-level automation exposure for Computer and Information Research Scientists: 15 O*NET tasks scored against their work activities, plus the simulator.

E-E-A-T Verified
Developed & audited by Gini Loh

Automation Exposure

59% weighted task index

15 of 15 tasks scored

Median Salary

$140,300 / year

BLS OEWS, May 2025 — this exact occupation

Employment Level

Medium

37,200 people hold this job — size, not growth

Projected 2025–35

+21.8% employment change

2,900 openings a year · BLS line item

Pay by state

BLS OEWS publishes 35 state estimates for this occupation. Each is its own survey estimate, not the national median adjusted for local prices.

$82,590 – $206,220

Highest medians

Oregon $206,220
Washington $202,400
New York $181,990
Massachusetts $170,510
New Mexico $165,690

Lowest medians

Michigan $82,590
Indiana $85,460
Georgia $92,250
Oklahoma $93,100
Utah $94,700

State figures come from the 15-1221 row in the May 2025 state panel. States where the estimate was suppressed or too small to publish are absent.

What the score is made of

Each task is mapped to its work activities, scored for AI automation potential, and weighted by how important those activities are to the job. These are the components.

Automation potential 59%

Importance-weighted mean of the scored tasks. This is the headline index.

Physical work 5%

Share of weighted tasks in hands-on or machine-operating work activities.

Judgment & influence 59%

Share in analysis, decisions, teaching, directing, advising, or caring for others.

Routine administration 0%

Share in documenting, recording, and administrative activities.

Rewritten by O*NET 0%

Share of weighted tasks O*NET rewrote in a recent update. Reported, not folded into the score.

Consequence of error 2/100 Low

O*NET's own rating of how serious an uncorrectable mistake would be here — respondents, not us. Deliberately not in the index: the score measures what AI can do with the task content, and multiplying it by stakes would be our judgment dressed as data.

Constituent Task Mix

15 tasks for this occupation, weighted by work-activity importance. Shares below are of total task weight, not task count.

High exposure (≥ 60% of the task is automatable) 47%

6 tasks

Medium exposure (≥ 35%) 53%

9 tasks

Low exposure (below 35%) 0%

0 tasks

How would you survive?

Move your week away from the high-exposure tasks and toward the ones that need judgment. The simulator recalculates the index as you shift the mix.

Simulate Upskilling →

Constituent Tasks

#14623 · Core · 70% automatable

Analyze problems to develop solutions involving computer hardware and software.

data analysis — Diagnoses operational problems from data; human acts

Analyze data to identify or resolve operational problems.
#14626 · Core · 60% automatable

Apply theoretical expertise and innovation to create or apply new technology, such as adapting principles for applying computers to new uses.

decision support — AI advises on IT solutions; humans implement and validate

Apply information technology to solve business or other applied problems.
#14624 · Core · 68% automatable

Assign or schedule tasks to meet work priorities and goals.

decision support — Assignments drafted; accountability and negotiation human

Assign duties or work schedules to employees.
#14628 · Core · 62% automatable

Meet with managers, vendors, and others to solicit cooperation and resolve problems.

decision support — IT troubleshooting collaboration well-supported by AI

Collaborate with others to resolve information technology issues.
#14633 · Core · 50% automatable

Design computers and the software that runs them.

decision support — Integrated systems need human architecture and stakeholder judgment

Design integrated computer systems.
#14629 · Core · 82% automatable

Conduct logical analyses of business, scientific, engineering, and other technical problems, formulating mathematical models of problems for solution by computers.

data analysis — Trend and relationship detection in data

Analyze data to identify trends or relationships among variables.
#14625 · Core · 55% automatable

Evaluate project plans and proposals to assess feasibility issues.

decision support — Design feasibility review aided, engineer owns judgment

Evaluate project designs to determine adequacy or feasibility.
#14635 · Core · 45% automatable

Participate in multidisciplinary projects in areas such as virtual reality, human-computer interaction, or robotics.

interpersonal — Research collaboration is iterative human teamwork

Collaborate on research activities with scientists or technical specialists.
#14627 · Core · 55% automatable

Consult with users, management, vendors, and technicians to determine computing needs and system requirements.

interpersonal — Collaborative spec-setting requires human negotiation

Collaborate with others to determine design specifications or details.
#14630 · Core · 58% automatable

Develop and interpret organizational goals, policies, and procedures.

text generation — Goals drafted; leadership accountability human

Develop organizational goals or objectives.
#14632 · Core · 70% automatable

Develop performance standards, and evaluate work in light of established standards.

data analysis — IT performance metrics well-suited to AI

Develop performance metrics or standards related to information technology.
#14634 · Supplemental · 54% automatable

Maintain network hardware and software, direct network security measures, and monitor networks to ensure availability to system users.

data analysis — AI monitors network performance via telemetry

Monitor the performance of computer networks. Maintain computer hardware.
#14637 · Supplemental · 44% automatable

Direct daily operations of departments, coordinating project activities with other departments.

decision support — AI coordinates cross-team plans; human resolves conflicts

Manage information technology projects or system activities. Coordinate project activities with other personnel or departments.
#14631 · Supplemental · 45% automatable

Participate in staffing decisions and direct training of subordinates.

interpersonal — Software training content AI-generatable, live coaching human

Train others in computer interface or software use. Participate in staffing decisions.
#14636 · Supplemental · 50% automatable

Approve, prepare, monitor, and adjust operational budgets.

decision support — Resource allocation tradeoffs need human judgment and authority

Manage budgets for appropriate resource allocation.
Embed this calculator on your site ↓

Bloggers & authors: Embed this interactive calculator directly in your articles or comparison guides. It loads dynamically via a responsive iframe (auto-resizing to prevent double scrollbars) and provides a direct, high-value tool for your audience.

<div class="giniloh-calculator-embed" data-calculator="computer-and-information-research-scientists"></div> <script src="https://giniloh.com/embed.js" async></script>

Community Sentiment

Do you agree?

Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?

Method

How this was scored

  1. 1. Tasks. O*NET task statements for this occupation, from a release whose newest record is dated 08/2026.
  2. 2. Work activities. Each task maps to 1–5 Detailed Work Activities; each activity belongs to one of 41 Generalized Work Activities that O*NET rates for importance (1–5) in this occupation.
  3. 3. Automation potential. Every work activity carries one score for how far current AI can perform it end-to-end. Tasks inherit the mean of their activities.
  4. 4. Weighting. Task weight = 0.35 + 0.65 × (importance − 1)/4, scaled by how often the task is performed and by 0.7 for Supplemental tasks. Importance is the task's own O*NET rating where it exists (18,369 of 18,838 tasks); the rest inherit their work activities' importance. The index is the weighted mean.

Check: across the 910 occupations where O*NET also rates how far machine speed sets the pace, this index moves opposite to it (Spearman ρ = -0.49). The more a job is paced by equipment, the less of its task content AI can address — the relationship you would expect if the scoring is working.

Sources · O*NET 31.0 (task records to 08/2026) · BLS OEWS May 2025 · BLS projections 2025-2035 · rubric v2.1 · tasks for O*NET, not a forecast

See the full method →

Related Article

Engineer at work

Best AI Proof Jobs in a Changing Market

Worried robots are coming for your paycheck? You’re not alone—but the real story is far more hopeful. This guide cuts through the scare headlines to reveal exactly where smart, sustainable career opportunities exist right now. We’ve curated a list of true ai proof jobs—roles in healthcare, skilled trades, and cybersecurity that not only survive automation but thrive because of human judgment and empathy. You’ll get specific, money-making data on projected growth (the BLS says wind turbine technicians, for instance, will grow 44% by 2032), real salary ranges from active job listings, and a simple self-assessment quiz to identify your own most resilient path. Plus, we name companies hiring today and the niche job boards they use. Stop worrying and start planning—your secure career is closer than you think.

Read Article ->