Community Sentiment
Do you agree?
Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?
AI Automation Index
Task-level automation exposure for Materials Scientists: 16 O*NET tasks scored against their work activities, plus the simulator.
Automation Exposure
16 of 16 tasks scored
Median Salary
BLS OEWS, May 2025 — this exact occupation
Employment Level
8,470 people hold this job — size, not growth
Projected 2025–35
600 openings a year · BLS line item
BLS OEWS publishes 30 state estimates for this occupation. Each is its own survey estimate, not the national median adjusted for local prices.
$69,010 – $177,030
Highest medians
Lowest medians
State figures come from the 19-2032 row in the May 2025 state panel. States where the estimate was suppressed or too small to publish are absent.
Each task is mapped to its work activities, scored for AI automation potential, and weighted by how important those activities are to the job. These are the components.
Importance-weighted mean of the scored tasks. This is the headline index.
Share of weighted tasks in hands-on or machine-operating work activities.
Share in analysis, decisions, teaching, directing, advising, or caring for others.
Share in documenting, recording, and administrative activities.
Share of weighted tasks O*NET rewrote in a recent update. Reported, not folded into the score.
O*NET's own rating of how serious an uncorrectable mistake would be here — respondents, not us. Deliberately not in the index: the score measures what AI can do with the task content, and multiplying it by stakes would be our judgment dressed as data.
16 tasks for this occupation, weighted by work-activity importance. Shares below are of total task weight, not task count.
3 tasks
9 tasks
4 tasks
Move your week away from the high-exposure tasks and toward the ones that need judgment. The simulator recalculates the index as you shift the mix.
Simulate Upskilling →Tasks O*NET added or rewrote for this occupation in its recent updates (05/2025 – 08/2026), with who proposed them. Additions are not in the scored task inventory — they are new work O*NET is still measuring, so they appear here and nowhere in the index. A Revision replaces a task that is scored, which is why only those move the "Rewritten by O*NET" share.
Research or design methods of processing, forming, and firing materials to develop products, such as ceramic dental fillings, unbreakable dinner plates, and telescope lenses.
Replaced: Research methods of processing, forming, and firing materials to develop such products as ceramic dental fillings, unbreakable dinner plates, and telescope lenses.
Review and select materials for products to meet product design and cost requirements.
Conduct research on the structures and properties of materials, such as metals, alloys, polymers, and ceramics, to obtain information that could be used to develop new products or enhance existing ones.
data analysis — Product research aided; physical testing human
Test metals to determine conformance to specifications of mechanical strength, strength-weight ratio, ductility, magnetic and electrical properties, and resistance to abrasion, corrosion, heat, and cold.
visual inspection — Quality testing of materials is hands-on inspection
Test material samples for tolerance under tension, compression, and shear to determine the cause of metal failures.
visual inspection — Quality testing of materials is hands-on inspection
Determine ways to strengthen or combine materials or develop new materials with new or specific properties for use in a variety of products and applications.
decision support — AI aids product development; prototyping and testing human
Prepare reports, manuscripts, proposals, and technical manuals for use by other scientists and requestors, such as sponsors and customers.
text generation — Reports drafted; presentations need human delivery
Plan laboratory experiments to confirm feasibility of processes and techniques used in the production of materials with special characteristics.
decision support — Study designs aided; scientific accountability human
Recommend materials for reliable performance in various environments.
decision support — New-tech advice needs organizational context judgment
Supervise and monitor production processes to ensure efficient use of equipment, timely changes to specifications, and project completion within time frame and budget.
decision support — Conformance checking aided by AI, but on-site verification is human
Research methods of processing, forming, and firing materials to develop such products as ceramic dental fillings, unbreakable dinner plates, and telescope lenses.
data analysis — Product research aided; physical testing human
Perform experiments and computer modeling to study the nature, structure, and physical and chemical properties of metals and their alloys, and their responses to applied forces.
decision support — Physical theory needs expert scientific judgment
Devise testing methods to evaluate the effects of various conditions on particular materials.
decision support — Protocols drafted; scientific validity human-owned
Test individual parts and products to ensure that manufacturer and governmental quality and safety standards are met.
visual inspection — Quality testing of materials is hands-on inspection
Confer with customers to determine how to tailor materials to their needs.
interpersonal — Client information exchange is live relational work
Visit suppliers of materials or users of products to gather specific information.
interpersonal — Observation and interviews are inherently human
Write research papers for publication in scientific journals.
text generation — AI drafts; original expertise and authorship are human
Teach in colleges and universities.
text generation — Science instruction content AI-assisted; delivery human
Bloggers & authors: Embed this interactive calculator directly in your articles or comparison guides. It loads dynamically via a responsive iframe (auto-resizing to prevent double scrollbars) and provides a direct, high-value tool for your audience.
<div class="giniloh-calculator-embed" data-calculator="materials-scientists"></div>
<script src="https://giniloh.com/embed.js" async></script> Community Sentiment
Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?
Method
Check: across the 910 occupations where O*NET also rates how far machine speed sets the pace, this index moves opposite to it (Spearman ρ = -0.49). The more a job is paced by equipment, the less of its task content AI can address — the relationship you would expect if the scoring is working.
Sources · O*NET 31.0 (task records to 08/2026) · BLS OEWS May 2025 · BLS projections 2025-2035 · rubric v2.1 · tasks for O*NET, not a forecast
See the full method →Related Article
Worried robots are coming for your paycheck? You’re not alone—but the real story is far more hopeful. This guide cuts through the scare headlines to reveal exactly where smart, sustainable career opportunities exist right now. We’ve curated a list of true ai proof jobs—roles in healthcare, skilled trades, and cybersecurity that not only survive automation but thrive because of human judgment and empathy. You’ll get specific, money-making data on projected growth (the BLS says wind turbine technicians, for instance, will grow 44% by 2032), real salary ranges from active job listings, and a simple self-assessment quiz to identify your own most resilient path. Plus, we name companies hiring today and the niche job boards they use. Stop worrying and start planning—your secure career is closer than you think.
Read Article ->