Gini Loh System Tools

AI Automation Index

Will AI Replace Human Factors Engineers and Ergonomists?

Task-level automation exposure for Human Factors Engineers and Ergonomists: 26 O*NET tasks scored against their work activities, plus the simulator.

E-E-A-T Verified
Developed & audited by Gini Loh

Automation Exposure

53% weighted task index

26 of 26 tasks scored

Median Salary

$102,440 / year

BLS OEWS, May 2025 — this exact occupation

Employment Level

Very High

365,740 people hold this job — size, not growth

Projected 2025–35

+12.4% employment change

23,100 openings a year · BLS line item

Pay by state

BLS OEWS publishes 52 state estimates for this occupation. Each is its own survey estimate, not the national median adjusted for local prices.

$81,820 – $156,510

Highest medians

Alaska $156,510
Washington $129,050
Oregon $128,290
New Mexico $128,090
California $124,600

Lowest medians

Puerto Rico $81,820
South Dakota $93,200
Mississippi $95,830
Kentucky $96,820
North Dakota $96,940

State figures come from the 17-2112 row in the May 2025 state panel. States where the estimate was suppressed or too small to publish are absent.

What the score is made of

Each task is mapped to its work activities, scored for AI automation potential, and weighted by how important those activities are to the job. These are the components.

Automation potential 53%

Importance-weighted mean of the scored tasks. This is the headline index.

Physical work 0%

Share of weighted tasks in hands-on or machine-operating work activities.

Judgment & influence 35%

Share in analysis, decisions, teaching, directing, advising, or caring for others.

Routine administration 12%

Share in documenting, recording, and administrative activities.

Rewritten by O*NET 0%

Share of weighted tasks O*NET rewrote in a recent update. Reported, not folded into the score.

Consequence of error 0/100 Low

O*NET's own rating of how serious an uncorrectable mistake would be here — respondents, not us. Deliberately not in the index: the score measures what AI can do with the task content, and multiplying it by stakes would be our judgment dressed as data.

Constituent Task Mix

26 tasks for this occupation, weighted by work-activity importance. Shares below are of total task weight, not task count.

High exposure (≥ 60% of the task is automatable) 44%

12 tasks

Medium exposure (≥ 35%) 48%

12 tasks

Low exposure (below 35%) 8%

2 tasks

How would you survive?

Move your week away from the high-exposure tasks and toward the ones that need judgment. The simulator recalculates the index as you shift the mix.

Simulate Upskilling →

Emerging & rewritten tasks

Tasks O*NET added or rewrote for this occupation in its recent updates (05/2025 – 08/2026), with who proposed them. Additions are not in the scored task inventory — they are new work O*NET is still measuring, so they appear here and nowhere in the index. A Revision replaces a task that is scored, which is why only those move the "Rewritten by O*NET" share.

  • New 08/2024 · Occupational Expert

    Assess systems to identify and quantify risk factors.

Constituent Tasks

#16393 · Core · 42% automatable

Collect data through direct observation of work activities or witnessing the conduct of tests.

data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human

Research human performance or health factors related to engineering or design activities.
#16378 · Core · 42% automatable

Conduct interviews or surveys of users or customers to collect information on topics, such as requirements, needs, fatigue, ergonomics, or interfaces.

data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human

Research human performance or health factors related to engineering or design activities.
#16396 · Core · 55% automatable

Advocate for end users in collaboration with other professionals, including engineers, designers, managers, or customers.

interpersonal — Conferring with technical staff on plans is relational work

Confer with technical personnel to prepare designs or operational plans.
#16387 · Core · 22% automatable

Inspect work sites to identify physical hazards.

visual inspection — Physical site verification against specs is human

Inspect facilities or sites to determine if they meet specifications or standards.
#16381 · Core · 82% automatable

Prepare reports or presentations summarizing results or conclusions of human factors engineering or ergonomics activities, such as testing, investigation, or validation.

text generation — Document test results from provided data

Document design or operational test results.
#16379 · Core · 55% automatable

Recommend workplace changes to improve health and safety, using knowledge of potentially harmful factors, such as heavy loads or repetitive motions.

decision support — General safety advice; accountability and context human

Advise others on health and safety issues.
#16383 · Core · 42% automatable

Perform functional, task, or anthropometric analysis, using tools, such as checklists, surveys, videotaping, or force measurement.

data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human

Research human performance or health factors related to engineering or design activities.
#16380 · Core · 55% automatable

Provide technical support to clients through activities, such as rearranging workplace fixtures to reduce physical hazards or discomfort or modifying task sequences to reduce cycle time.

decision support — General safety advice; accountability and context human

Advise others on health and safety issues.
#16392 · Core · 60% automatable

Assess the user-interface or usability characteristics of products.

decision support — Usefulness assessment needs context and testing

Assess product or process usefulness.
#16386 · Core · 65% automatable

Establish system operating or training requirements to ensure optimized human-machine interfaces.

decision support — Operational criteria drafted; human decides

Determine operational criteria or specifications.
#16385 · Core · 42% automatable

Integrate human factors requirements into operational hardware.

data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human

Research human performance or health factors related to engineering or design activities.
#16374 · Core · 35% automatable

Review health, safety, accident, or worker compensation records to evaluate safety program effectiveness or to identify jobs with high incidence of injury.

physical manipulation — Workplace safety inspection is on-site human

Investigate safety of work environment.
#16397 · Core · 66% automatable

Design or evaluate human work systems, using human factors engineering and ergonomic principles to optimize usability, cost, quality, safety, or performance.

data analysis — Evaluates operations from data; human owns conclusions

Analyze operational data to evaluate operations, processes or products. Develop technical methods or processes.
#16372 · Core · 68% automatable

Write, review, or comment on documents, such as proposals, test plans, or procedures.

text generation — Assemble proposal documents from provided content

Prepare proposal documents.
#16373 · Core · 40% automatable

Train users in task techniques or ergonomic principles.

interpersonal — Operational procedure training needs live demonstration

Train personnel on proper operational procedures.
#16391 · Core · 42% automatable

Conduct research to evaluate potential solutions related to changes in equipment design, procedures, manpower, personnel, or training.

data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human

Research human performance or health factors related to engineering or design activities.
#16375 · Core · 68% automatable

Provide human factors technical expertise on topics, such as advanced user-interface technology development or the role of human users in automated or autonomous sub-systems in advanced vehicle systems.

decision support — Proposes design changes; human validates feasibility

Recommend technical design or process changes to improve efficiency, quality, or performance.
#16388 · Core · 60% automatable

Develop or implement human performance research, investigation, or analysis protocols.

decision support — Protocols drafted; scientific validity human-owned

Devise research or testing protocols.
#16389 · Core · 60% automatable

Develop or implement research methodologies or statistical analysis plans to test and evaluate developmental prototypes used in new products or processes, such as cockpit designs, user workstations, or computerized human models.

decision support — Protocols drafted; scientific validity human-owned

Devise research or testing protocols.
#16377 · Core · 69% automatable

Estimate time or resource requirements for ergonomic or human factors research or development projects.

data analysis — Time estimates from task data; human calibrates

Estimate technical or resource requirements for development or production projects. Estimate time requirements for development or production projects.
#16390 · Core · 78% automatable

Design cognitive aids, such as procedural storyboards or decision support systems.

text generation — Draft procedural documents from provided content

Prepare procedural documents.
#16395 · Core · 42% automatable

Analyze complex systems to determine potential for further development, production, interoperability, compatibility, or usefulness in a particular area, such as aviation.

data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human

Research human performance or health factors related to engineering or design activities.
#16376 · Core · 42% automatable

Investigate theoretical or conceptual issues, such as the human design considerations of lunar landers or habitats.

data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human

Research human performance or health factors related to engineering or design activities.
#16384 · Core · 30% automatable

Operate testing equipment, such as heat stress meters, octave band analyzers, motion analysis equipment, inclinometers, light meters, thermoanemometers, sling psychrometers, or colorimetric detection tubes.

data analysis — AI interprets results; human runs physical tests

Test performance of electrical, electronic, mechanical, or integrated systems or equipment.
#16382 · Core · 60% automatable

Perform statistical analyses, such as social network pattern analysis, network modeling, discrete event simulation, agent-based modeling, statistical natural language processing, computational sociology, mathematical optimization, or systems dynamics.

data analysis — AI builds computational models; engineer validates assumptions

Create models of engineering designs or methods.
#16394 · Core · 60% automatable

Apply modeling or quantitative analysis to forecast events, such as human decisions or behaviors, the structure or processes of organizations, or the attitudes or actions of human groups.

data analysis — AI builds computational models; engineer validates assumptions

Create models of engineering designs or methods.
Embed this calculator on your site ↓

Bloggers & authors: Embed this interactive calculator directly in your articles or comparison guides. It loads dynamically via a responsive iframe (auto-resizing to prevent double scrollbars) and provides a direct, high-value tool for your audience.

<div class="giniloh-calculator-embed" data-calculator="human-factors-engineers-and-ergonomists"></div> <script src="https://giniloh.com/embed.js" async></script>

Community Sentiment

Do you agree?

Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?

Method

How this was scored

  1. 1. Tasks. O*NET task statements for this occupation, from a release whose newest record is dated 08/2026.
  2. 2. Work activities. Each task maps to 1–5 Detailed Work Activities; each activity belongs to one of 41 Generalized Work Activities that O*NET rates for importance (1–5) in this occupation.
  3. 3. Automation potential. Every work activity carries one score for how far current AI can perform it end-to-end. Tasks inherit the mean of their activities.
  4. 4. Weighting. Task weight = 0.35 + 0.65 × (importance − 1)/4, scaled by how often the task is performed and by 0.7 for Supplemental tasks. Importance is the task's own O*NET rating where it exists (18,369 of 18,838 tasks); the rest inherit their work activities' importance. The index is the weighted mean.

Check: across the 910 occupations where O*NET also rates how far machine speed sets the pace, this index moves opposite to it (Spearman ρ = -0.49). The more a job is paced by equipment, the less of its task content AI can address — the relationship you would expect if the scoring is working.

Sources · O*NET 31.0 (task records to 08/2026) · BLS OEWS May 2025 · BLS projections 2025-2035 · rubric v2.1 · tasks for O*NET, not a forecast

See the full method →

Related Article

Engineer at work

Best AI Proof Jobs in a Changing Market

Worried robots are coming for your paycheck? You’re not alone—but the real story is far more hopeful. This guide cuts through the scare headlines to reveal exactly where smart, sustainable career opportunities exist right now. We’ve curated a list of true ai proof jobs—roles in healthcare, skilled trades, and cybersecurity that not only survive automation but thrive because of human judgment and empathy. You’ll get specific, money-making data on projected growth (the BLS says wind turbine technicians, for instance, will grow 44% by 2032), real salary ranges from active job listings, and a simple self-assessment quiz to identify your own most resilient path. Plus, we name companies hiring today and the niche job boards they use. Stop worrying and start planning—your secure career is closer than you think.

Read Article ->