Community Sentiment
Do you agree?
Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?
AI Automation Index
Task-level automation exposure for Human Factors Engineers and Ergonomists: 26 O*NET tasks scored against their work activities, plus the simulator.
Automation Exposure
26 of 26 tasks scored
Median Salary
BLS OEWS, May 2025 — this exact occupation
Employment Level
365,740 people hold this job — size, not growth
Projected 2025–35
23,100 openings a year · BLS line item
BLS OEWS publishes 52 state estimates for this occupation. Each is its own survey estimate, not the national median adjusted for local prices.
$81,820 – $156,510
Highest medians
Lowest medians
State figures come from the 17-2112 row in the May 2025 state panel. States where the estimate was suppressed or too small to publish are absent.
Each task is mapped to its work activities, scored for AI automation potential, and weighted by how important those activities are to the job. These are the components.
Importance-weighted mean of the scored tasks. This is the headline index.
Share of weighted tasks in hands-on or machine-operating work activities.
Share in analysis, decisions, teaching, directing, advising, or caring for others.
Share in documenting, recording, and administrative activities.
Share of weighted tasks O*NET rewrote in a recent update. Reported, not folded into the score.
O*NET's own rating of how serious an uncorrectable mistake would be here — respondents, not us. Deliberately not in the index: the score measures what AI can do with the task content, and multiplying it by stakes would be our judgment dressed as data.
26 tasks for this occupation, weighted by work-activity importance. Shares below are of total task weight, not task count.
12 tasks
12 tasks
2 tasks
Move your week away from the high-exposure tasks and toward the ones that need judgment. The simulator recalculates the index as you shift the mix.
Simulate Upskilling →Tasks O*NET added or rewrote for this occupation in its recent updates (05/2025 – 08/2026), with who proposed them. Additions are not in the scored task inventory — they are new work O*NET is still measuring, so they appear here and nowhere in the index. A Revision replaces a task that is scored, which is why only those move the "Rewritten by O*NET" share.
Assess systems to identify and quantify risk factors.
Collect data through direct observation of work activities or witnessing the conduct of tests.
data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human
Conduct interviews or surveys of users or customers to collect information on topics, such as requirements, needs, fatigue, ergonomics, or interfaces.
data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human
Advocate for end users in collaboration with other professionals, including engineers, designers, managers, or customers.
interpersonal — Conferring with technical staff on plans is relational work
Inspect work sites to identify physical hazards.
visual inspection — Physical site verification against specs is human
Prepare reports or presentations summarizing results or conclusions of human factors engineering or ergonomics activities, such as testing, investigation, or validation.
text generation — Document test results from provided data
Recommend workplace changes to improve health and safety, using knowledge of potentially harmful factors, such as heavy loads or repetitive motions.
decision support — General safety advice; accountability and context human
Perform functional, task, or anthropometric analysis, using tools, such as checklists, surveys, videotaping, or force measurement.
data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human
Provide technical support to clients through activities, such as rearranging workplace fixtures to reduce physical hazards or discomfort or modifying task sequences to reduce cycle time.
decision support — General safety advice; accountability and context human
Assess the user-interface or usability characteristics of products.
decision support — Usefulness assessment needs context and testing
Establish system operating or training requirements to ensure optimized human-machine interfaces.
decision support — Operational criteria drafted; human decides
Integrate human factors requirements into operational hardware.
data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human
Review health, safety, accident, or worker compensation records to evaluate safety program effectiveness or to identify jobs with high incidence of injury.
physical manipulation — Workplace safety inspection is on-site human
Design or evaluate human work systems, using human factors engineering and ergonomic principles to optimize usability, cost, quality, safety, or performance.
data analysis — Evaluates operations from data; human owns conclusions
Write, review, or comment on documents, such as proposals, test plans, or procedures.
text generation — Assemble proposal documents from provided content
Train users in task techniques or ergonomic principles.
interpersonal — Operational procedure training needs live demonstration
Conduct research to evaluate potential solutions related to changes in equipment design, procedures, manpower, personnel, or training.
data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human
Provide human factors technical expertise on topics, such as advanced user-interface technology development or the role of human users in automated or autonomous sub-systems in advanced vehicle systems.
decision support — Proposes design changes; human validates feasibility
Develop or implement human performance research, investigation, or analysis protocols.
decision support — Protocols drafted; scientific validity human-owned
Develop or implement research methodologies or statistical analysis plans to test and evaluate developmental prototypes used in new products or processes, such as cockpit designs, user workstations, or computerized human models.
decision support — Protocols drafted; scientific validity human-owned
Estimate time or resource requirements for ergonomic or human factors research or development projects.
data analysis — Time estimates from task data; human calibrates
Design cognitive aids, such as procedural storyboards or decision support systems.
text generation — Draft procedural documents from provided content
Analyze complex systems to determine potential for further development, production, interoperability, compatibility, or usefulness in a particular area, such as aviation.
data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human
Investigate theoretical or conceptual issues, such as the human design considerations of lunar landers or habitats.
data analysis — Human factors analysis aided; empirical studies human
Operate testing equipment, such as heat stress meters, octave band analyzers, motion analysis equipment, inclinometers, light meters, thermoanemometers, sling psychrometers, or colorimetric detection tubes.
data analysis — AI interprets results; human runs physical tests
Perform statistical analyses, such as social network pattern analysis, network modeling, discrete event simulation, agent-based modeling, statistical natural language processing, computational sociology, mathematical optimization, or systems dynamics.
data analysis — AI builds computational models; engineer validates assumptions
Apply modeling or quantitative analysis to forecast events, such as human decisions or behaviors, the structure or processes of organizations, or the attitudes or actions of human groups.
data analysis — AI builds computational models; engineer validates assumptions
Bloggers & authors: Embed this interactive calculator directly in your articles or comparison guides. It loads dynamically via a responsive iframe (auto-resizing to prevent double scrollbars) and provides a direct, high-value tool for your audience.
<div class="giniloh-calculator-embed" data-calculator="human-factors-engineers-and-ergonomists"></div>
<script src="https://giniloh.com/embed.js" async></script> Community Sentiment
Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?
Method
Check: across the 910 occupations where O*NET also rates how far machine speed sets the pace, this index moves opposite to it (Spearman ρ = -0.49). The more a job is paced by equipment, the less of its task content AI can address — the relationship you would expect if the scoring is working.
Sources · O*NET 31.0 (task records to 08/2026) · BLS OEWS May 2025 · BLS projections 2025-2035 · rubric v2.1 · tasks for O*NET, not a forecast
See the full method →Related Article
Worried robots are coming for your paycheck? You’re not alone—but the real story is far more hopeful. This guide cuts through the scare headlines to reveal exactly where smart, sustainable career opportunities exist right now. We’ve curated a list of true ai proof jobs—roles in healthcare, skilled trades, and cybersecurity that not only survive automation but thrive because of human judgment and empathy. You’ll get specific, money-making data on projected growth (the BLS says wind turbine technicians, for instance, will grow 44% by 2032), real salary ranges from active job listings, and a simple self-assessment quiz to identify your own most resilient path. Plus, we name companies hiring today and the niche job boards they use. Stop worrying and start planning—your secure career is closer than you think.
Read Article ->