Gini Loh System Tools

AI Automation Index

Will AI Replace Economists?

Task-level automation exposure for Economists: 14 O*NET tasks scored against their work activities, plus the simulator.

E-E-A-T Verified
Developed & audited by Gini Loh

Automation Exposure

57% weighted task index

14 of 14 tasks scored

Median Salary

$124,720 / year

BLS OEWS, May 2025 — this exact occupation

Employment Level

Low

17,790 people hold this job — size, not growth

Projected 2025–35

+4.7% employment change

1,100 openings a year · BLS line item

Pay by state

BLS OEWS publishes 41 state estimates for this occupation. Each is its own survey estimate, not the national median adjusted for local prices.

$70,750 – $167,590

Highest medians

District of Columbia $167,590
New Jersey $167,550
Delaware $159,120
Maryland $144,680
Kansas $138,790

Lowest medians

Puerto Rico $70,750
Kentucky $71,400
Louisiana $73,050
Nebraska $75,880
Arizona $79,610

State figures come from the 19-3011 row in the May 2025 state panel. States where the estimate was suppressed or too small to publish are absent.

What the score is made of

Each task is mapped to its work activities, scored for AI automation potential, and weighted by how important those activities are to the job. These are the components.

Automation potential 57%

Importance-weighted mean of the scored tasks. This is the headline index.

Physical work 0%

Share of weighted tasks in hands-on or machine-operating work activities.

Judgment & influence 60%

Share in analysis, decisions, teaching, directing, advising, or caring for others.

Routine administration 13%

Share in documenting, recording, and administrative activities.

Rewritten by O*NET 8%

Share of weighted tasks O*NET rewrote in a recent update. Reported, not folded into the score.

Consequence of error 4/100 Low

O*NET's own rating of how serious an uncorrectable mistake would be here — respondents, not us. Deliberately not in the index: the score measures what AI can do with the task content, and multiplying it by stakes would be our judgment dressed as data.

Constituent Task Mix

14 tasks for this occupation, weighted by work-activity importance. Shares below are of total task weight, not task count.

High exposure (≥ 60% of the task is automatable) 40%

5 tasks

Medium exposure (≥ 35%) 47%

7 tasks

Low exposure (below 35%) 13%

2 tasks

How would you survive?

Move your week away from the high-exposure tasks and toward the ones that need judgment. The simulator recalculates the index as you shift the mix.

Simulate Upskilling →

Emerging & rewritten tasks

Tasks O*NET added or rewrote for this occupation in its recent updates (05/2025 – 08/2026), with who proposed them. Additions are not in the scored task inventory — they are new work O*NET is still measuring, so they appear here and nowhere in the index. A Revision replaces a task that is scored, which is why only those move the "Rewritten by O*NET" share.

  • New 08/2024 · Occupational Expert

    Construct and manage economic datasets.

  • New 08/2024 · Occupational Expert

    Present research at seminars and conferences.

  • Revision 08/2024 · Occupational Expert

    Review documents written by others, such as referee reports.

    Replaced: Review documents written by others.

Constituent Tasks

#7536 · Core · 82% automatable

Study economic and statistical data in area of specialization, such as finance, labor, or agriculture.

information retrieval — AI can search and summarize literature, human curates

Review professional literature to maintain professional knowledge.
#7538 · Core · 55% automatable

Compile, analyze, and report data to explain economic phenomena and forecast market trends, applying mathematical models and statistical techniques.

data analysis — Forecasting is uncertain; human judgment on drivers

Forecast economic, political, or social trends.
#20052 · Core · 45% automatable

Study the socioeconomic impacts of new public policies, such as proposed legislation, taxes, services, and regulations.

data analysis — Analysis aided; study design and fieldwork human

Conduct research on social issues.
#21106 · Core · 54% automatable

Explain economic impact of policies to the public.

information retrieval — AI explains policies; human handles live questions

Explain regulations, policies, or procedures. Present information to the public.
#23988 · Core · 84% automatable Revision

Review documents written by others.

text generation — Proofreading text for accuracy is core LLM strength

Review technical documents to plan work. Proofread documents, records, or other files to ensure accuracy.
#7537 · Core · 62% automatable

Provide advice and consultation on economic relationships to businesses, public and private agencies, and other employers.

decision support — Drafts advice; accountability and context owned by human

Advise others on business or operational matters.
#7539 · Core · 55% automatable

Formulate recommendations, policies, or plans to solve economic problems or to interpret markets.

decision support — Policy analysis drafted; political judgment human

Advise others on matters of public policy.
#7542 · Core · 32% automatable

Supervise research projects and students' study projects.

interpersonal — Trainee supervision is relational and accountability-bearing

Supervise trainees.
#20053 · Core · 72% automatable

Conduct research on economic issues, and disseminate research findings through technical reports or scientific articles in journals.

text generation — Reports drafted; presentations need human delivery

Prepare scientific or technical reports or presentations.
#7540 · Core · 60% automatable

Develop economic guidelines and standards, and prepare points of view used in forecasting trends and formulating economic policy.

text generation — AI drafts standards; committee consensus and authority human

Establish standards for products, processes, or procedures.
#7544 · Core · 55% automatable

Teach theories, principles, and methods of economics.

text generation — Instruction content AI-assisted; live teaching human

Instruct college students in social sciences or humanities disciplines.
#7541 · Core · 15% automatable

Testify at regulatory or legislative hearings concerning the estimated effects of changes in legislation or public policy, and present recommendations based on cost-benefit analyses.

interpersonal — Testimony carries legal accountability and live presence

Testify at legal or legislative proceedings.
#20051 · Core · 44% automatable

Provide litigation support, such as writing reports for expert testimony or testifying as an expert witness.

text generation — Reports drafted; presentations need human delivery

Prepare scientific or technical reports or presentations. Testify at legal or legislative proceedings.
#7543 · Supplemental · 55% automatable

Forecast production and consumption of renewable resources and supply, consumption, and depletion of non-renewable resources.

data analysis — Forecasting is uncertain; human judgment on drivers

Forecast economic, political, or social trends.
Embed this calculator on your site ↓

Bloggers & authors: Embed this interactive calculator directly in your articles or comparison guides. It loads dynamically via a responsive iframe (auto-resizing to prevent double scrollbars) and provides a direct, high-value tool for your audience.

<div class="giniloh-calculator-embed" data-calculator="economists"></div> <script src="https://giniloh.com/embed.js" async></script>

Community Sentiment

Do you agree?

Do you agree with the AI automation risk score calculated for this occupation?

Method

How this was scored

  1. 1. Tasks. O*NET task statements for this occupation, from a release whose newest record is dated 08/2026.
  2. 2. Work activities. Each task maps to 1–5 Detailed Work Activities; each activity belongs to one of 41 Generalized Work Activities that O*NET rates for importance (1–5) in this occupation.
  3. 3. Automation potential. Every work activity carries one score for how far current AI can perform it end-to-end. Tasks inherit the mean of their activities.
  4. 4. Weighting. Task weight = 0.35 + 0.65 × (importance − 1)/4, scaled by how often the task is performed and by 0.7 for Supplemental tasks. Importance is the task's own O*NET rating where it exists (18,369 of 18,838 tasks); the rest inherit their work activities' importance. The index is the weighted mean.

Check: across the 910 occupations where O*NET also rates how far machine speed sets the pace, this index moves opposite to it (Spearman ρ = -0.49). The more a job is paced by equipment, the less of its task content AI can address — the relationship you would expect if the scoring is working.

Sources · O*NET 31.0 (task records to 08/2026) · BLS OEWS May 2025 · BLS projections 2025-2035 · rubric v2.1 · tasks for O*NET, not a forecast

See the full method →

Related Article

Engineer at work

Best AI Proof Jobs in a Changing Market

Worried robots are coming for your paycheck? You’re not alone—but the real story is far more hopeful. This guide cuts through the scare headlines to reveal exactly where smart, sustainable career opportunities exist right now. We’ve curated a list of true ai proof jobs—roles in healthcare, skilled trades, and cybersecurity that not only survive automation but thrive because of human judgment and empathy. You’ll get specific, money-making data on projected growth (the BLS says wind turbine technicians, for instance, will grow 44% by 2032), real salary ranges from active job listings, and a simple self-assessment quiz to identify your own most resilient path. Plus, we name companies hiring today and the niche job boards they use. Stop worrying and start planning—your secure career is closer than you think.

Read Article ->